Archive

Archive for November, 2007

寒暄周末

November 27, 2007 Leave a comment

 

 

 父母打电话来,问我周末都在干什么。

 

“连续周六和周日都呆在家里看书。”我说。

 

“那也好,最近市中心常有示威,少一点下坡是好的。我们这边哪,有人用巴士将那些有兴趣示威的人载到首都去。这几天警察忙得不得了,到处设置路障。还是留在家里好。”妈妈说。

 

“自从搬了家,整天就只喜欢呆在家里。一到周末,非到不得已时都不会出门。”我说。

 

“那就好。但是你一整天没出门,那你吃什么?”妈妈问。

 

“自己煮啊。那次回家你叫我带回来的肉类,足有五六公斤,我到现在都还没有动过。”我说。

 

“哦。记得我教过你的煮法啦。”

 

换爸爸讲。

 

“都在看什么书?”爸爸问。

 

“最近易中天很红,早前刚好在苏州有买到几本,每天早上就看他的“品人录”。到了晚上就看柏杨的“中国人史纲”。柏老写历史已经写到不同的境界去了,文笔比起以前更加放逸洒脱,嬉笑谩骂完全不顾虑任何东西。”我说。

 

“哦。我这边的黄仁宇看完了,下次你回来的时候可以拿回去。”爸爸说。

 

与妈妈的寒暄通常是关于家事,人情和关切个人的时事。爸爸方面就常谈国家大事,公事和他的社团事务。各有千秋。

 

不管到了那里,每个人的根总还是在亲人那里。

Categories: Free Style

Bro vs Bro

November 27, 2007 Leave a comment

 

Police Report [report no Kelana Jaya A/002187/07] dated 19 March 2007

lodged by Thirunama Karasu a/l Kandar Velupillai (who claimed to be Dato VK Lingam’s brother)

against Dato V. K Lingam.

This report was lodged with the Brickfields police station.

Pengadu menyatakan:
FURTHER TO MY REPORT DATED 16 MARCH 2007 KELANA JAYA REPORT NOMBER 2115/07, I NOW WISH TO ADD FURTHER BECAUSE THE I.O TUAN SAIFUL IN THIS CASE FROM KELANA JAYA REFUSE TO TAKE MY STATEMENTS IN DETAILS AND THEREFORE I HAD TO LODGE THIS FURTHER REPORT TO SET OUT DETAILS. I FEAR MY LIFE AND THE SAFETY OF MY FAMILY BECAUSE I WANTED TO LODGE A POLICE REPORT AT BUKIT AMAN ON 6 MARCH 2007 ON ALL CORRUPTION CASES OF MY BROTHER DATUK V. KANALINGAM AND THOSE INVOLVED IN THESE CORRUPTION CASES WITH MY BROTHER ARE AS FOLLOWS.

1) I WAS USED BY MY BROTHER V. KANAGALINGAM TO CORRUPT THE FORMER CHIEF JUDGE TUN EUSOFF CHIN, THE FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL TAN SRI MOHTAR ABDULLAH, THE FORMER IGP TAN SRI RAHIM NOOR, THE PRESENT COURT OF APPEAL JUDGES DATUK MOHTAR SIDIN, THE PRESENT COURT OF APPEAL JUDGE DATO LOW HOP BING AND A FORMER JUDGE DATO K.L REKRAJ.

2) IN 1995 I WITNESS MY BROTHER DATO V. KANAGALINGAM CORRUPTING A FORMER INDUSTRIALIST COURT CHAIRMAN MR SATCHI WHERE I SAW MY BROTHER HANDING OVER A CHEQUE IN THE SUM OF RM 50,000.00.

3) IN 1995 I WITNESS A DINNER HOSTED BY MY BROTHER DATO V. KANAGALINGAM AT HIS HOUSE NO 1 JALAN SS 7/24 KELANA JAYA 47301 PJ FOR THE FORMER CHIEF JUDGE TUN EUSOFF CHIN’S WIFE AND CHILDREN WERE PRESENT. ALSO PRESENT IN THIS DINNER WERE THE FORMER COURT OF APPEAL PRESIDENT TAN SRI LAMIN YUNUS AND HIS WIFE, MY OTHER BROTHER DATO V. SIVAPRANJOTHI A LAWYER, MY BROTHER V. PANJARATNAM A ENGINEER, DATO V. KANAGALINGAM’S BODYGUARD ENCIK RAMLI AND BUDIMAN, AND A MALAY SECURITY GUARD. MY BORTHER’S WIFE DATIN GHANAJOTHY AND CHILDREN SIVASAKTI, SIVAJOTHI WERE ALSO PRESENT IN THIS DINNER. I WAS TOLD BY MY BROTHER DATUK V.KANAGALINGAM TO COME FOR THIS DINNER BECAUSE TO CLEAN UP THE HOUSE AND GARDEN, ARRANGE THE TABLE AND CHAIRS PRIOR TO THE DINNER.

4) IN 1996 I DELIVERED A NEW LEATHER BRIEFCASE, A WALLET, A LADY’S LEATHER HAND BEG, SOME DOCUMENTS WERE IN THE BRIEFCASE. I PERSONALLY DELIVERED THIS THINGS TO TUN EUSOFF CHIN IN PERSON IN HIS HOUSE. I WAS TOLD BY MY BROTHER DATO V. KANAGALINGAM TO DELIVER THIS THINGS.

5) I WAS TOLD BY MY BROTHER DATO V. KANAGALINGAM TO GO TO TUN EUSOFF CHIN’S HOUSE WITH MY OTHER BROTHER V. PANJARATNAM TO DELIVER 3 BOWLS OF SOUP WHICH WAS PREPARED BY V. PANJARATNAM’S WIFE REBECCA FOR TUN EUSOFF CHIN WIFE WHO WAS SICK AT THAT TIME. I AND MY BROTHER V. PANJARATNAM WENT THERE IN A PROTON WIRA BEARING NO BDV 1862 BELONGING TO PANJARATNAM.

6) I HAVE ALSO SENT MY BROTHER DATO V. KANAGALINGAM USING MY CAR A NISSAN SUNNY 130Y BEARING NO PLATE WBS 9443 TO TUN EUSOFF CHIN’S HOUSE. I HAVE ALSO WENT WITH MY BROTHER DATO V. KANAGALINGAM A NUMBER OF TIMES USING HIS CAR A BMW 988 A MERC 320 WED 5 A HONDA CAR BELONGING TO DATIN GHANAJOTHY, A VOLVO CAF 45, A OLD WHITE MERZ (8101) ANOTHER BMW (WDN) A PROTON WIRA BDV 1862 BELONGING TO V. PANJARATNAM. THE FORMER DRIVER MR CHANDRAN HAVE ALSO SENT DATO V. KANALINGAM TO EUSOFF CHIN’S HOUSE. WHENEVER I SENT MY BROTHER DATO V. KANAGALINGAM TO EUSOFF CHIN’S HOUSE, HE DATO V. K WILL BE CARRING A VERY BIG BUNDLE OF FILES AND WHEN I GO BACK TO PICK HIM UP HE WILL BE CARRYING BACK A SINGLE FILE. I USUALLY SENT MY BROTHER DATO V. KANAGALINGAM AT ABOUT 11.30 PM AND PICK HIM UP AT ABOUT 12.30 PM TO 1.00 AM.

7) IN 1996 CASH WAS GIVEN TO ME BY MY BROTHER DATO V. KANAGALINGAM TO PURCHASE HANDPHONE FROM MUTIARA TELECOMMUNICATIONS SDN BHD LOT 1 LEVEL 1 SHAHZAN PRUDENTIAL TOWER AT NO 30 JALAN SULTAN SIMAIL KL. FOR TUN EUSOFF CHIN. THIS PHONE WAS DELIVERED TO TUN EUSOFF CHON’S HOUSE BY A FAMILY FRIEND MR FRANCIS KOK CHEE KHOON.

8) I HAVE ALSO IN 1996 GIVEN A CASH CEHQUE BY MY OTHER BROTHER DATO V. SIVAPRANJOTHI A LAWYER TO PURCHASE A HANDPHONE FOR FORMER JUDGE K.L REKRAJ. I DELIEVERED THIS HANDPHONE IN PERSON TO DATO K.L REKRAJ AT HIS HOUSE. HE DATO K.L REKRAJ ASKED ME FOR EXTRA BATTERIES. THIS PHONE WAS REGISTERED UNDER DATO K.L REKRAJ WIFE.

9) A FAMILY FRIEND MR FRANCIS KOK CHEE KHOON HAVE ALSO TAKE MY BROTHERS DATO V. KANAGALINGAM AND DATO V. SIVAPRANJOTHO TO TUN EUSOFF CHIN’S HOUSE.

10) IN 1996 I WAS TOLD BY MY BROTHER DATO V. KANAGALINGAM TO SENT A OLD HEAVY BRIEFCASE (A DARK BROWN) TO THE PRESENT COURT OF APPEAL JUDGE DATO LOW HOP BING. HE DATO V. KANAGALINGAM TOLD ME TAHT DATO LOW HOP BING ACCIDENTALLY LEFT THE BRIEFCASE IN THE CAR BEARING NUMBER PLATE CAF 45 A VOLVO. MR FRANCIS KOK CHEE KHOON WAS PRESENT WHEN I COLLECTED THE BRIEFCASE IN FRONT OF DATO V. KANAGALINGAM’S HOUSE.

11) IN 1996 I AND MR FRANCIS KOK CHEE KHOON WAS TOLD BY MY BROTHER DATO V. KANAGALINGAM TO DELIVER 2 NOS HANDPHONE TO THE PRESENT COURT OF APPEAL JUDGE DATO MOHTAR SIDIN AT JALAN GURNEY KUALA LUMPUR. I AND MR FRANCIS KOK CHEE KHOON WENT THERE IN A VOLVO CAF 45. I HAVE ALSO GONE TO DATO MOHTHAR SIDIN’S HOUSE WITH MY BROTHER DATO V. KANAGALINGAM. I HAVE ALSO GONE TO DATO MOHTAR SIDIN’S HOUSE IN JALAN GURNEY USING MY MOTORBIKE BEARING NO PLATE WAX 6191 A YAMAHA TO SENT DOCUMENTS AND ALSO DELIVER A HANDPHONE.

12) IN 1996 CASH WAS GIVEN TO ME BY MY BROTHER DATO V. KANAGALINGAM TO SETTLE A HANDPHONE BILL IN THE NAME OF FORMER IGP TAN SRI RAHIM NOOR. SOMETIMES THE HANDPHONE BILLS OF FORMER IGP TAN SRI RAHIM NOOR IS SETTLE BY MY SISTER CHINMAYA DEVI WHO IS EMPLOYED WITH V.K LINGAM & CO AND SOMETIMES BY MR FRANCIS KOK CHEE KHOON AND ALSO BY A FORMER COLONEL.

13) IN 1996 MAY I WAS AT MY BROTHERS OFFICE AT SHAHZAN TOWER WITH MY BROTHER DATO V. KANAGALINGAM AND MY SISTER CHINMAYA DEVI. ALL A SUDDEN MY UNCLE MR. PERINCURAMASAMY CAME RUSHING TO INFORM MY BOTHER DATO V. KANAGALINGAM THAT THE ACA IS COMING TO MY BROTHER’S OFFICE TO INVESTIGATE CORRUPTION ON PERWAJA STEEL.
BEFORE THE ACA CAN COME TO MY BROTHER OFFICE DATO V. KANAGALINGAM TOLD ME, CHINMAYA DEVI (MY SISTER) AND FRANCIS CHEE KOON TO WITHDRAW LARGE SUM OF MONEY FROM ORIENTAL BANK JALAN SULTAN ISMAIL UNDER THE ACCOUNT OF DATO V. KANAGALINGAM. DATO V. KANAGALINGAM OLSO TOLD ME TO TAKE 5 NOS BANK DRAFT EACH AMOUNTING 60,000.00 POUNDS. I ALSO WAS TOLD BY MY BROTHER DATO V. KANAGALINGAM TO OPEN A ACCOUNT UNDER MY NAME IN PUBLIC BANK AND BANK IN RM 275,000.00 WHICH I DI. MR FRANCIS KOK CHEE KHOON ALSO WITHDRAW A LARGESUM OF MONEYWHICH HE PUT IN THE BLACK BIG BAG AND LATER BANK IN INTO HIS ACCOUNT. MY SISTER CHINMAYA DEVI ALSO WITHDRAW A LARGE SUM OF MONEY AND FOLLOWED MR FRANCIS KOK CHEE KHOON. I DID NOT KNOW WHAT MY SISTER CHINMAYADEVI DID WITH THE MONEY.
LATER THE FIVE BANK DRAFTS OF 60,000.00 POUNDS EACH WAS BANK IN TO THE ACCOUNT OF THE FOLLOWING PERSON IN LONDON. THIS PEOPLE FOLLOWED DATO V. KANAGALINGAM TO LONDON BEFORE GOING TO USA MAYO CLINIC IN ROCHESTER MINNESOTA.
1) MR K SUPPIAH 60,000.00 POUNDS WAS BANK INTO HIS ACCOUNT IN LONDON
2) DATIN GHANAJOTHI 60,000.00 POUNDS WERE BANK INTO HER ACCOUNT IN LONDON
3) MR RAJENDRA VELLUPILLAI 60,000.00 POUNDS WAS BANK INTO HIS ACCOUNT IN LONDON
4) THIRUNAMA KARASU VELLUPILLAI 60,000.00 WAS PUT INTO MY ACCOUNT IN LONDON
5) DATO V. KANAGALINGAM 60,000.00 POUNDS WAS PUT INTO HIS ACCOUNT IN LONDON
6) V. KANAKALASHIMI RM 100,000.00 GIVEN CASH AT NO 28 SECTION 21/1 SEA PARK PJ AT HER HOUSE.

14) IN 1998 MY BROTHER DATO V. KANAGALINGAM CAME TO MY HOUSE AND TOOK ME IN HIS VOLVO (940) TO CHINESE RESTAURANT IN SEA PARK SECTION 21/1. MY SISTER V. KANAKALASHMI ALSO CAME TO THE RESTAURANT. IN THIS RESTAURANT MY BROTHER DATO K. KANAGALINGAM THREATENED ME NOT TO TELL THE ACA ABOUT HIS DEALING WITH THE JUDGES, THE FORMER IGP TAN SRI RAHIM NOOR AND ALSO THOSE INVOLVED. HE TOLD ME THAT I MAKE SURE SOMETHING WILL HAPPEN TO ME AND THAT I HAVE MENTIONED THE JUDGES AND FORMER IGP. THE POLICE WILL ARREST ME AND MY CHILDREN WILL BE KIDNAPPED BY THE JUDGES. HE THREATENED BECAUSE I HAVE GIVEN A FULL STATEMENT TO A LAWYER NOW KNOWN AS DATO SAFEE ABDULLAH OF SAFEE & CO IN 1997 AT HIS HOUSE TOGETHER WITH MR SULAIMAN ABDULLAH A LAWYER PRESENT. FURTHER MORE IN 1997 DECEMBER I WAS FORCED TO SIGN A STATUTORY DECLARATION WHICH WAS PREPARED BY MY BROTHER DATO V. SIVAPRANJOTHI AND DATO V. KANAGALINGAM AT A HOTEL VALUE INN KELANG SELANGOR. OTHERS WHO FORCED ME SIGH THE STATUTORY DECLARATION WERE MR SATCI, SISTER V. KANAGALASHMI, SISTER CHINMAYADEVI AND BROTHERV. PANJARATNAM.
IN 1998 MARCH MY BROTHER SENT 3 LAWYERS MR C. VIJAYAKUMAR, DATO SITHAMBARAM, DATO KUMARENDRAN WHO FORCED ME INTO MAKING A FALSE STATEMENT AND MADE ME SIGN THE STATEMENT ON 81 PAGES. THEY THEN TOLD ME TO GET ADMITTED FOR TWO YEARS IN HOSPITAL BAHAGIA IPOH. I REFUSED. THEY THEN TOLD ME TO PUT UP A ACT THAT I AM VERY DEPRESSED AND MENTALLY UNSTABLE AND GET ADMITTED TO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL. THEY PUT FEAR INTO ME DURING THE 1998 ACA INVESTIGATION. I TOLD THEM THAT IN 1998 THE FIRST STATEMENT AND THE THIRD STATEMENT WHICH I GAVE TO THE ACA IN 1998 IS TRUE AND THE SECOND STATEMENT IS FALSE.

Categories: Uncategorized

十二星座

November 19, 2007 4 comments

 

 

一些算命专业人士之中,广泛流传着一个这样的说法:紫薇准于算流年运程,八字准于批命运际遇,星座则准于看一个人的宿命性格。

 

很多人相信星座之余,对于这个世上只有12种命运这种说法肯定会有一点不甘。但是心有不甘之余,还是要感叹星座有时真的是挺准的。紫薇八字的命运组合固然多,但也不过是几十万百万,比较现今全球人口还是小巫见大巫。况且罗里罗嗦评论了一番后,算命师还是要以几个论点来总结一个人的宿命运程。一到这个的阶段,不管之前讲的怎样天花乱坠,全体人类也还是可以笼统大约地分成几大类而已。

 

为什么只有12种星座?很有可能是上帝在编排部署每一个人类的性格命运时,由于长时间的工作而产生一种郁闷的心情,开始觉得麻烦而索性随便安排。12种不多也不少,只要一个人有足够豁达的胸怀,还是可以接受自己只不过是12种人的其中一种。

 

这种情形就很像凡人一样。一个人开始工作时,由于还有新鲜感,总觉得工作内容非常有趣,而且工作内容还不简单。但是这份工作持续了几年后,开始会感到工作性质固然繁多,但也走不出一定的范畴。当我们习惯性地将工作归类,手上的东西再复杂,也不再会带来任何惊喜了。

 

在妇产科工作的护士小姐们,在刚开始的时候一定会觉得自己的工作充满意义,为人们迎接新生命的来临,给予未来妈妈们鼓励和安慰。但是想象一下,几年下来,护士小姐面对了成千上万个产妇,接了上万个小生命过后,即使当年有满溢的爱心,也在千万个案子之中耗尽不剩了。

 

到了最后,来见珍的产妇之中,不过是分成“有问题”和“没有问题”两种而已。有者更加进化到对于产妇们紧张的心情可以完全视而不见,因为对于该护士而言,不管你怎样穷紧张都好,没有问题就是没有问题。就算现在我对你说了什么或是做了什么,结果还是一样不会改变。

 

剩下的只是不含人性的公式化检验和手术。所以看到周星驰在“大内密探零零发”一剧中饰演的妇产科医生,面对到来求诊的妇女们,一律都面无表情地说:“执番剂药好吗?!”,其实也并非全是无厘头的演绎。

 

对于那些看得够化的人来说,什么样的命运性格,只要笼统来讲,也不过是那几类。12星座甚至都还嫌太多。

Categories: Free Style

VK Lingam Tape, Part II

November 14, 2007 3 comments

Categories: News and politics

They dont show it on tv.

November 11, 2007 1 comment
  
 
10-11-2007, KL.
Rally for "Kebersihan" summoned by the opposition parties. But it ended that the police and FRU were the ones who did the cleaning and washing works (with freakin chemicals and somke bombs).
Categories: News and politics

灰色地带

November 5, 2007 4 comments

 

 

新加坡国会最近发生一件有趣的事。

 

话说近几十年来新加坡的国情有走向开放的趋势。他们的电影院内可以播放限制级的电影,“色戒”完整版可以在那边看到。去年也有艳舞团在该国巡回演出,听说资政李光耀先生也有去看。近几个月,国会酝酿着将同性恋合法化,有意向欧美一些先进国看齐,在亚洲地区率先正式承认同性恋关系。

 

这种改革性的举动令国内的同性恋活跃份子非常雀跃,满心欢喜期待着国会通过废除肛交及其他违反自然性交的刑事犯罪。

 

但是事与愿违,新加坡国会里一些保守派议员极力反对废除有关法律。经过激烈的辩论后,国会终于通过保留原本的刑事法律。男性同性恋者这回是白开心一场了。

 

这样一个令人失望的国会决定,并不容易向人民交代清楚。说得不好听,好像是政府开了同性恋们的一个玩笑;说的中庸一点,就是开了倒车。于是这项新闻发布会无疑是对李显龙总理政治智慧的一项严峻考验。一个说错了口,可是会成为笑柄的。

 

但是李显龙倒是应对得不错。他说,虽然有关同性恋刑事法律没有被废除,但是政府不会积极地执行该法律,这一部份仍让它停留在法律的灰色地带。社会大众对于接受同性恋的课题仍存有很大的分歧,而且只有少数人关注这个课题。大部份的国民对同性恋者的态度基本上是不支持,不反对也不干扰,彼此日子照过。因此,政府也宁可在立法时保持模糊地带,以免激起两方对同性恋课题更激烈的反应。

 

这种就叫做“政治家”。在适当的时候,具伸缩性地表明某些课题是处于灰色地带的,绝不可能黑白分明。要是你硬要我分明黑白的话,没办法,我只好睁大眼睛向你们说大话了。既然我不想向民众说大话,那么我也希望民众能够接受现实,接受这种灰色地带的安排。

 

像他那么老实的血淋淋剖白,只要是聪明人都应该闭嘴了。

 

李显龙说这番话的时候,他赌的是民众的智慧和成熟度。只要民智开化少一点,大家都还是很天真幼稚,只相信这个世界不是黑就是白的话,李显龙这次肯定没有过关得那么容易。

 

所以说,伟大的政治家是出生于伟大的时代和伟大的群众当中的。

Categories: Free Style